Happy Steve

Innovation and Learning

Start with clarity of intent.

Now build it out with an evocative vision. Improvise progress by tinkering: with lots of trial and lots of error. The not knowing is the best bit: the mysteries the surprises, and from time to time the windfalls! 

Hello there, I'm Steve Collis! 

Click on "contact", won't you, and wave right back at me?

13 year old sends Hello Kitty into Space

Hat tip to Adrian Bruce who shared this. A 13 year old girl has sent a Hello Kitty doll to the edge of space, mounted with several cameras. The footage is jaw-dropping:

There is so much that I want to say about this - about the way we've constructed an over-long childhood, and infantalise young people - socialising them for factory jobs that either don't exist anymore, or represent a dream of stable employment now 65 years old. 

I still remember an entire History unit when I was in Year 9, that consisted of copying notes from the board. It was teaching me something, that's for sure, but the something was less about history and more about the acceptance of mindless repetition.

This girl isn't copying out lines, OR falling into line.

She's launching Hello Kitty into space.

Metaphor anyone!?

Shaped Spaces and Learning - In a Cave or On the Stage?

I've parroted 'Technology is Space' for a few years now, because I have high confidence in the ability of this perspective to bring insight to where technology fits in schools and in learning generally. If you want an accessible entry point to this line of thinking, have a look at this article by David Thornburg.

I've seen technology wreck learning - often - and when I track back what has gone wrong I perceive the absence of an insightful framework into what technology is, the nature of the beast.

dreamstime_xs_26369892.jpg

A telltale sign: goals to 'increase use of technology' in a school, or 'to encourage teachers to use technology'. These goals are nonsensical. They aren't legitimate goals. If technology is space, then the goal 'enhance learning with technology' reads 'enhance learning with space' - why not just 'enhance learning?' and then work from there to contextual strategies?

Tech is no holy grail. It is hyped up like Finland. 

Our world is characterised by constantly emerging and re-emerging relationships, no noun can tame these and dish up an easy solution. 

By saying 'technology is space' we open up a plethora of possible containers for these relationships. Thornburg does this with the terms: Cave, Campfire, Watering Hole. Each of these describes a relationship - Cave = 1:self, Campfire = 1:many, and Watering Hole = many:many.

These three terms provide a powerful taxonomy that can be used in one breath to examine physical spaces, and the very next, virtual. There isn't, in my opinion, any hard difference between physical and virtual - it's only a matter of degree: cause-and-effect in the raw universe versus cause-and-effect in a shaped universe. Technology is the shaping. By this definition our school sports field (artificially shaped space) might be a much better space for my French class than a chat system (artificially shaped space).

Spaces have affordances and constraints. In different spaces, some relatonships are possible, others unlikely. Relationships between you and me, me and them, me and me, you and you, each with many modes and modalities. It gets complicated.

When I work through Cave / Campfire / Watering Hole with school leaders we often hit an ambiguity characterising the 'blog.'

Some want to call a blog a Cave, thinking of the individual relating intimately to their own inner world as they compose their post. It is the feeling of writing a diary entry: 'dear diary', with an experience of deep inner flow as we conceptualise our thoughts in the glow of the computer screen. 

Others leap immediately to its other quality as a Campfire: blog posts can be read by many - they are a broadcast.

This mash-up of the Cave with the Campfire explains why so many get themselves in trouble with regretted tweets. Staring at the screen, one feels alone, and externalising one's thoughts feels little more than throwing a message in a bottle out into the ocean, whereas it is in fact throwing the message into a printing press, for prompt delivery to as many wish to receive and attend to.

A boy from Anastasis Academy talks about his journing with blogging.

Track cause-and-effect, affordances and constraints, through this mash-up of an iPhone + laptop + two students.

Ideas bouncing from brains to wall back to brains. Note textbook and calculator also feature - where do they fit? How are they shaped-space, and what do they shape?

All kinds of social melt-downs among teenagers (let alone adults) are caused by a weak literacy in these new spaces, these new bubbles of spaces that are multiplying (bye bye MySpace, hello Pinterest).

A particular issue is the bandwidth of the space, since raw face to face communication includes tone, facial expressions, posture, etc, whereas derivative technological spaces are often little more than text. The low-bandwidth of a blog post creates a sense of safety, because the spotlight is not on my every reaction... I feel secure to fashion my message, and refashion it over time. I'd rather remain in diary mode (cave mode) and write an email than give the person a call with its self-exposure via nuances of voice.

In working to reform email use at my school, it became clear we often use email as a diary entry, meant to sort out our own thoughts rather than to communicate with conciseness or clarity. We appropriate spaces for our own agendas, and spaces become associated with particular purposes.

Space is cause and effect - that's all it is. Space mediates relationships (between objects, people, ideas, information). We appropriate space to manipulate these relationships toward certain ends. Think: cricket bat, tanning bed, letter to the editor, knife and fork. Spaces can be re-appropriated for previously unimagined purposes, and mashed-up together in the process. 

We shape the space, then the space shapes us, or it's just not cricket.

So here's an interesting question: how might we inspire younger people to shape powerful new spaces for their own purposes? 

Boldly go...

Dunalley Primary School Burned Down, How to Help

Seven days ago Dunalley Primary School in Tasmania, was burned down by the bushfires. You can read their story in their own words here.

Their website photo album shows what used to be - what has burned down.

Their children have drawn pictures and written messages - "I love my school. I whish It wasent bernt Down I want it back again." - 6 year old Ella Burnet-Whitney

The buildings are gone but the ambition is to open for the new year with no interruption. The Education Minister Nick McKim has announced demountables are already on their way.

There are clear and definite ways you can help their community:

- Donate item(s) - they have published an itemised list of bread-and-butter items they need to function here, including a cash donation appeal.

***** STOP PRESS JAN 13 - I've noticed on their website they are now requesting cash or voucher donations only. What a great sign of people's generosity! ******

- check status of what is still needed at their Facebook page here.

- Megan IemmaSue Wyatt and Donnelle Batty set up a google spreadsheet to help track items donation and practical assistance tasks here

- Finally, there is click-to-donate initiative that has been set up via Eventbrite, here

Brain Bucks

I've made up a term: 'brain dollars', A brain dollar is a unit of good quality attention. Let's say, in 24 hours, you have 100 'brain dollars' to spend. It's a tight budget!

What are you spending them on?

Me? I'm spending it on stuff.

I know what you're thinking - whatever stuff I'm spending my bucks on must be mighty important. 

brain bucks.JPG

It's really hard to know! My stuff is insidiously infected with powerful entities that demand $$. 

What will really help me, is to allocate a few of my brain bucks - let's say 15 of them, to establish and maintain an Expenditures Committee. My E.C. will look for ways to shift the budget. 

It will hold meetings in my prefrontal cortex. It will speak confidently and hopefully.

It will say: "Let's build a new budget around increasing the spend on Profoundly Worthwhile." It will say it again tomorrow. It's bucks well spent!

Hopefully it will spiral - and I'll reinvest the $$ earned on intensifying the process. Before you know it, my budget will be full of purpose. Deliberate. Mindful.

I tip my hat to you, dear reader. Let's spend 'em well! 

People VS Ideas

There's nothing so dangerous as an idea. They topple kingdoms, provoke genocides, create technologies to kill, exploit, shut out.

An idea can bring blessing too - an insight or invention that feeds the hungry, protects an ecosystem, facilitates justice, gives voice to the marginalised.

Ideas operate at a higher scale than individuals. They are parasites and viruses. They hatch in our minds but rapidly transcend - sometimes sweeping in epidemics through the collective consciousness of connected society. We are simply the substrate. Together our billions of minds create a neuro-ecosystem where idea-animals roam, feed, breed like rabbits, metamorphise. 

Do ideas care whether they bring destruction or benediction?

Information technologies provide the links between families, tribes, subcultures, cultures, meta-cultures that make the idea-substrate possible at a speed and critical mass previously impossible. You have to rewind to the development of speech or even earlier to trace the beginnings.

It came in bunny hops: the invention of writing (Socrates warned it was the end of us!), the printing press (cite Gessner in 1565 panicking about the 'confusing and harmful abundance of books), TV, radio, internet.

We have spawned a derivative universe. It is a Wild Wild West - no law and order to restrain. And, it is subject to feedback loops with no discernible upper limits.

Socrates was right to sound the alarm. The advent of writing was the birth of a derivative universe.

Edu-Memes

Ideas come in bundles, with centres of gravity formed by a myriad of likely shared presuppositions, favoured explanations, scripts, definitions and buzzwords. Picture overlapping orbits around a galactic centre, with the more likely utterances in the centre, and increasingly marginilised or rare utterances in progressively outlying orbits. 

The central, likely bundles might be more likely because they are wiser. Or, because they are better at exploiting our push-buttons: fear of rejection, desire for acceptance, love, lust, hunger, appetite for beauty, appetite for watching others fail...

The collective noun for these meme-complexes is 'discourse'.

Would we have any hesitation in identifying some of the edu-animals in the edu-zoo?

- schools kill creativity (proposition)

- industrial paradigm vs 21st century learning

- Flipped Learning

- Gamification

- GBL

- PBL

- Reggio Emilia

- Constructivism

- Direct Instruction

- Hattie

- Visible Thinking

- Blended Learning

- Personalised Learning

- BYOD

These are not discrete ideas but gravity-wells in themselves, with their own peculiar sets of orbits, clichés, insights, blind spots, contradictions, aspirations, filters within filters.

Picture the globe, then picture a pinprick representing each person infected with one of these gravity-wells. We are colonised by contagions. These contagions are complex complexes, but you can meaningfully discern their existence and movement.

Crucially, they transcend context.

Ideas versus Context

I am an ideas-junkie. I crave them, I swim in them, and I've been obsessed with finding better insights better maps. I really dig Karl Popper - the quest for better explanations of a baffling world.

And you see, I want to heal the world, and ideas hold out this promise, since they scale up a level of existence I can only glimpse. Ideas are the 'One Ring' that seduces me. 

It's in that very transcendent property of ideas that they become tyrannical, that they cause scaled-up damage. An idea cares nothing of context. It just wants to exist in a brain, in any brain, by being labelled 'good' or 'true' or some other payoff. 

We all want 'answers' - all the more so in complex situations where no clear path forward presents itself. For example, umm.... er.... schools! Oh then must we be wary, cautious! 

In the same way a machine gun does not care what side it is being used on, neither does an idea.

Context is everything. An idea is only proved functional, beneficial, to us, its host, in the pragmatics of the situation in all its non-transcendent specificity. 

This is why lesson plans are a grain of salt, syllabuses an oppressive fantasy, and the timetable a prison. They may have a function, they may be necessary, in the transcendent. In the actual they may help or hinder learning. It really depends, like, you know, on the situation.

Context is everything.

Context is everything.

Context re-creates the text over and over. The transcendent idea is another beast altogether in its individual manifestations. This is true of biological systems too: look at how a cell operates! Transcendent, higher order emerges, but when you drill it down to components you have molecules slamming into each other all over the place in a blaze of randomness: everything is local and idiosyncratic.

The lesson of this story: rise up against these tyrannous idea-overlords, and embrace locality - the moment, the context, as the primary domain.

Be suspicious of ideology.

Experiment. Innovate. Intuit. Improvise. 

By what map, then? If maps are not to be trusted?

Ideas vs People

Remember, if ideas live in an ecosystem of which we make up the substrate... WE ARE the substrate. 

So bring your attention back to people. To yourself as a person.

What is right in front of your eyes? Who?

Let all ideas dissolve. All preconceptions. Who is there, in the space, with you?

How are they? Where are they seeking to go?

Look, now, at the teacher in a classroom, with students. Look again - there is no teacher, no classroom, no students. There were only ever people. The rest were ideas, and since context is everything, all ideas are fiction. The words we inherited betrayed us. Allegiance 

I badge myself as an idea-junkie. More than anything else, this is a warning to myself. 

Give me the choice between a beautiful, gracious person who cares profoundly and authentically for others, but has never heard of or embraced the edu-memes that sweep through cyberspace, and some of which I promote quite enthusiastically...

...a choice between that teacher and another, earnestly implementing a personalised, tech-savvy strategy, but doesn't genuinely care... watch her/him, checking email in the corner while the kids are hypnotised by the glow of the screens.

Which would I choose?

The best of both worlds, of course. Great new ideas, applied contextually, insightfully, and always subservient to a deep connectedness and commitment to community and wellbeing.

But if I had to choose?

This idea-junkie would choose people over ideas every time. If you notice me behaving otherwise, oh strange blog-reader, please be a friend:

slap me, call an intervention, and book me in for detoxing, for I have lost myself to my drug. 

A Centre of Gravity in Scale

We exist across three worlds.

Downstream, the micro-world makes up our bodies and minds, and can malfunction and make us sick at any time. It is our substrate and if it fails, we fail. The mysterious molecules have their own billions of agendas, yet we emerge from them. They exist at a time-scale much shorter than...

...the world we live in, made up of our loved ones, communities - those we exist to serve, and who serve us, and who we depend on and are dependable for. I do not know who I am, apart from these people, who have made me and who I in turn make, in my words and actions. Fragile, I'm in your hands. Fragile, you are in mine. That's a classroom, that's a school. We just get blinded by concepts drilled down from...

...further upstream, lies an alien world. It used to exist at a slower-timescale to ours, but it has sped up and overtaken us, drilling back down into the movement of electrons through copper and photons through cable. It can only exist while we flourish, for we maintain its nervous system of wires and electricity, and hemoglobin of paper and ink.

It has an agenda that terrifies me. It is the Tower of Babel, the Borg, the Other, even though it is made out of us. It sends drones with missiles to destroy 'randoms'. It locks out 'refugees'. It invokes narratives and seductive fictions, making the world feel safer and simpler, populated by heroes and villains. It turns us against each other for its own agenda.

It can't exist without us, and we can't exist without it. It provides us with language to speak, and as we speak we become the mechanism for its perpetuation.

The warning is: even as we exist in these three worlds, to remember our home, our centre.

In the moment, there is me, and you, in a space together,

Hi, there.