Happy Steve

Innovation and Learning

ELH Conference 2010 - Tune in Live

The Expanding Learning Horizons Conference is taking place again, from tomorrow (22nd August 2010) for three days. I will be there broadcasting via webcam where I can.

In particular, come back to www.happysteve.com tomorrow (Sunday 22nd) at 2pm AEST (GMT+10) for my session. I'll be talking about project based learning and specifically, running an internet radio station. Hopefully I can broadcast my own session live, and in any case all my notes and a live chat system will be here.

My colleague Mark Liddell will be speaking on "Maths is So Boring - How to Change the Attitude of our Students Through the Use of Technology" at 10.45am on Monday.
And my colleague Chantelle Morrison will be speaking on "E-magazines for the Faint Hearted" at 11:45am on Tuesday.

If I can I will broadcast the keynotes and whatever other sessions I can.

You can see the program here: http://elh2010.ning.com/ (you can also join the Ning and connect with attendees that way).

Check the Twitter hashtags #elh and #elh2010 to follow the twitter conversation.

What if a school subject was 3D?

Read on to see how Tim Barrett is creating a school subject in 3D virtual form, so that students literally walk through the course in a virtual world.

You may be aware we established a new 3D virtual island using free software called "Open Sim". This is open source software, meaning it was created by volunteers who allow anyone to use it without paying. Admittedly, we do then have to pay a company, "Reaction Grid", to run the software for us. This is as cheap s $75 a month, and they take much of the hassle out of actually getting your virtual world to work. This is much less expensive than Linden Lab's Second Life, where we run our original island.

This new Open Sim island is 8 times as large as our original, and we have a great deal more control over it, including the ability to allow our young primary students to access the world.

I've been spending some time preparing the island for a huge influx of students. I've already granted some students access, and also created an account for every member of staff at our school (they've been wandering in out of curiosity and having a walk around!)

The next step is for me to recruit student leaders from every grade and train them up rigorously to be 'moderators' of the new virtual world. They will protect the space against misbehaviour, cyber-bullying, or vandalism. They will set the tone and culture of the virtual world.

I've been busy 'terra-forming' our virtual world, adding trees, streams, and a huge mountain, so students have something to explore when they first log in. I've disabled flying so they have to walk around, unless they program for themselves a car or plane.

When they first log in, this is what they will see:

They have an invitation to follow a forest path through to a 'sandbox', which is an area of the virtual world where any student can start building.

They also see another arrow:

You see, I don't want students to feel forced into doing the training immediately. They can walk through the forest for a bit, if they want, but they'll be told they have to do the training before they wander far!

So, the student follows the arrow towards training, and sees:

There are some simple posters telling the student to approach the booth and click on it. What happens next is quite magical: the Open Sim software sends a signal to our 'Moodle' course management software and links the students virtual world account to their general school learning account. Many thanks to my colleague Grant Harbor for his input and assistance in getting this to work!

From this point onwards, a whole variety of 3D objects will recognise them. These 3D objects are virtual manifestations of learning materials that would have otherwise just been listed on a Moodle subject web page in our school poral.

Let me give you an example. I've not yet created the rest of the training course, I've just put in a proof-of-concept test object. Let's look at it:

In Moodle, I created a student survey question – do they prefer cats or dogs? Then, in our 3D world I made that survey question appear in 3D form. This means the student can answer the question in the virtual world, rather than in the text-based environment of a Moodle page. The student clicks on the coloured bar indicating their vote. Over time the two bars, red and green, will grow to show the proportion of students voting for each.

Contrast this 3D virtual world learning format to a bog-standard Moodle page, which looks like this:

And, of course, Moodle by itself, even though very text-based, is powerful and at our school has thoroughly disrupted the role of teacher-as-distributor-of-information and even teacher-as-director-of-students and recast their role as a mentor or coach. With learning resources at their fingertips, students are free to work at their own pace and in their own way, and we've seen them really thrive because of this.

However, as great as Moodle is, do you see the possibilities of a virtual-world manifestation of Moodle course activities?

Rather than working down a text web page, students could literally walk through a course. The subject could be set out like a village. Lessons could be cast as buildings in specific genres: shops, museums, banks… meeting halls, fiery lakes with a rickety bridge, mountains defended by dragons (defeat the dragon with learning!), and so forth.

The student might start with a map, and find their own path through the course. The starting point could be a crossroads with four signs. Students follow the path they choose. The road could fork. Students could be required to collect 'tokens' indicating mastery of each subject module. It's study, Burke and Wills style!

For Maths and Science students could undertake their own construction projects, creating 3D objects and simulations.

In History, great moments and turning points could be re-enacted by avatars, or even rewritten speculatively, with the enactment recorded as a video for online publication and teacher feedback and assessment. An assessment might be for a full three-week role play, where students are assigned social roles, (peasant, merchant, king, priest) and a context and must interact authentically for the historical context. This would also be a great spur for reflective writing.

In English, the 3D space would become a role-play space, a performance space, a publication space, an inspiration space. Chapters of texts could be recreated by students, so the book becomes alive with living landscape and personalities. Watch now as a Year 11 student meets Pip or plays the role of Miss Havisham. So too might King Lear rage at the storm. (Cue 3D storm now! And… action!).

And don't get me started about Visual Arts! What a match!

Don't get me wrong on one point: our new island will NOT be content-driven. As with our original Second Life space, students will be the major 'owners' of the space, literally building the world & the online culture over the coming months.

But they won't be the only builders!

Our first steps into true virtual 3D courses are beginning immediately with my dear colleague Mr Tim Barrett: http://twitter.com/tim__barrett
http://www.chaplaincymatters.org/

Tim is our school chaplain and has been teaching 'Studies of Religion' for a few years now in an entirely online mode, and in a face to face mode.

He will be our pioneer at taking everything we've learnt about student learning in Moodle, and recreating the learning in a 3D space.

It might blow up in his face! Maybe it won't work! This is an experiment – our first steps!

But imagine, students walking through mosques, cathedrals, churches, temples, monasteries, or recreating scenes or situations at Medina, Galilee, Bodh Gaya. Consider: the imagination gives us the power to connect with 'otherness', putting ourselves in others' shoes and gaining insight into the universal human condition. In Tim's course, students will literally walk in the shoes of others. Not a bad thing, since many of our students are from the culturally monolithic northern beaches of Sydney.

I'll keep you posted (and I am sure Tim will too, over at http://www.chaplaincymatters.org/). To hear what happens next, subscribe to my blog – look for the button in the right hand column of this page.

As always I welcome and will be delighted by your comments!

I'll finish with some more images of our work-in-progress virtual island:

 

 

 

 

 

Sydney Morning Herald Report

Some weeks ago Sydney Morning Herald reporter Megan Johnston visited my school to investigate ways we're using technology to disrupt and improve learning.

The report came out today, and I have to say she did a very good job of taking everything we threw at her and simplifying it without losing accuracy. 

The article refers to our virtual worlds program. She describes our approach to safety "all student activity is recorded and student moderators enforce the island's behavioural code". She refers to its popularity, "the island has become so popular it is now running out of space", and goes on to mention our new Open Sim project, "a second island [...] is being developed". 

Actually I have exciting news regarding our new virtual island. This is 8 times the size of our original space, and uses the open source software Open Sim:

Booralie 2 opensim_001
 

Our new world will be accessible by our Primary students. I can't wait to see their creativity come out in the world.

My colleague Tim Barrett is about to launch on an experiment to create a 3D version of his online Studies of Religion course. The idea is that students will literally walk through his course, journeying from location to location and immersing themselves in the relevant places, contexts, and moments in history. Instead of 'writing about' they'll 'role play', and when I say 'role play' I mean enter a 3D mosque, or cathedral, or temple, or church, and gain insight into how people's view of the universe is projected onto their buildings.

You can see Tim's blog here :http://www.chaplaincymatters.org/ and follow him on Twitter:http://twitter.com/tim__barrett

The same article, and a further one by Margie Sheedy in the same paper, refer to the 'Real Audience Project' - I've blogged a plenty about this. It's our name for taking student work and throwing it on the net. Not just in ONE class, but heading towards EVERY class in the school having an online 'stage' where student thoughts, essays, poetry, songs, videos, insights are put forward for the world to seeand respond to. A couple of prime examples: http://learningin10.wordpress.com/ (6 year olds talking about war), http://nbcsnews.wordpress.com (with 16,000 visitors), and 

A hidden jewel in the article by Johnston refers to "one group of HSC students recently debated politics with teenagers at an international school in Vietnam". This is a twist on the Real Audience Project. Why learn about the issues in the 'Society and Culture' course via a textbook, when you can interact directly with students from Vietnam? Students from this class report profound new insights that have arisen from this approach. The teacher of this class is Mrs Shani Hartley. Her students blog here: http://saclife.edublogs.org/. She blogs here: http://shartley.edublogs.org/ Follow her on Twitter here: @shhartley .

Shani is an inspiration, and a very active member of our school's innovation unit, the "Sydney Centre for Innovation in Learning". Have a look at the blogs and twitter feeds of some other of my colleagues:

Mark Liddellhttp://markliddell.wordpress.com/

Grant Harbor (who drives Real Audience Project with me): http://gharbor.wordpress.com/ (Grant is also a Moodle guru)

Chris Woldhuishttp://edwoldblogwold.blogspot.com/

If you'd like to visit our school and see some of these, and other projects in practice, drop us a line. See www.scil.nsw.edu.au/pd for more information. 

This is just the beginning. You can subscribe to my blog (see the right hand column of this page) and you can join us on this journey. I'd love to hear from you, and I'll keep you in touch with where we go next.

Come work with me!! (French teacher position available)

Dear readers of my humble blog,

My school, Northern Beaches Christian School, in Terrey Hills, Sydney, Australia, is currently looking to

SCIL Building

 take on a Secondary French teacher. I realise you may be reading from another country, or in Australia but interstate, but I am keen to cast our net as wide as possible! Who knows who might read this and either be keen to come and join our team, or know someone who might be interested.

It really is a fantastic opportunity. You'd be working with me, since I head up the Languages department, which has got to be a huge plus! 

Also, I think I work at the best school in the world! Staff morale is high, we treat each other kindly and supportively, we're open, collaborative, optimistic and creative in the way we approach teaching. 

We approach learning relationally, supporting the students and inspiring them. I've blogged about many of the things we do!

My school also runs the "Sydney Centre for Innovation in Learning" which opens up untold opportunities our staff (just ask me - I am a classic example). We reward, celebrate and support new ideas.

Do I paint a picture? I've been here 8 years and just love it!

Anyway, read on for a blurb about the job and how to find out more. Seriously, if you know anyone who might suit this position, send them the link to this post and let them know about it!

French Teacher


Unique opportunity at NBCS


Work in a highly innovative, multi-modal, state-of-the art learning
space, with a motivated, multi award winning French language team.


Northern Beaches Christian School is looking for a Secondary French
Teacher, starting Term 3, 2010. Applicants must be active Christians with
current church involvement.


To apply, download an application form from our website: www.nbcs.nsw.edu.au/employment


Applications close
Monday June 14, 2010. For more information, phone (02) 9986 7216 or email: work@nbcs.nsw.edu.au

That Which We Call A Rose

It’s all in the language.

“Well, I’ll worry about that later,” I thought to myself
yesterday. Then I noticed what I had said to myself and mentally reworded. I
find myself doing this very often nowadays.

You have to be very careful with the words you choose to
think with. Words are the bricks of reality. You choose different words for a
different reality. If you simply use the words you have inherited from the
communities to which you belong, then you are confining yourself to very
particular cardboard boxes without even the awareness of your own confines.

“I’ll worry about that later,” is a reality-molecule: a
recipe made of various atoms (words) assembled for a purpose. “I’ll worry about
that later,” is invoked easily and automatically as one of many mind-tools. Its
function, in this case, is to disarm an immediate threat with a rationalisation.

The phrase does its job when we use it. It provides a
strong, common-sense mental scaffold for tucking away a concern for the moment.
This is why it is such a popular phrase, and a standard riff in our internal mental
music.

It works, but we can do better. I don’t like ‘worry’. The
word describes a state of mind that is inefficient and unproductive. There are
much better words with which, if I am deliberate enough, I can supplant ‘worry’.

    I’ll develop…

    I’ll digest…

    I’ll play with…

    ...that one
later.

I’m aware how corny this language sounds. I don’t care.
Changing language works.

So now, turn your eyes to teaching. What mental scaffolding
are you working with, how did it get there, did you have any say in it, and
might you not begin to self-consciously tinker with it and improve it?

First, the word ‘teach’ takes an immediately alarming direct
object
. Verbs that take direct objects are verbs like: hit,
smack, hug, deny, love, hate, know, bury. It is something you DO
DIRECTLY
.

I hit you.

I smack you.

I hug you.

I deny you.

I love you.

I hate you.

I know you.

I bury you.

 

I lift you up, 

tie you down, 

pass you around, 

pummel you, 

exalt you, discuss you,

 Yes, and I teach you.

In verbs that take direct
objects, you are the passive recipient. There are interesting variations
– “I observe you” is hardly violent. But, you have little choice in the
matter. Even being observed has violent possibilities. Did you ask permission? Where is my privacy? 

I nourish you.

I feed you.

I support you.

These are still direct objects, and hardly violent, but there is still little room for YOU. And if I nourish, feed and support you, I will then

assess

examine

measure you.

Now, verbs with indirect objects have a different
feel. These are verbs that require a preposition between them and you. Prepositions act as a buffer, create space, and allow possibility, negotiation, and
unexpected freedoms:

I talk with you.

I walk alongside you.

I speak to you. (Still fairly aggressive but better than “I
lecture you”)

I negotiate with. (The word ‘with’ is a winner)

I listen to you. (I'm doing the action but the action conveys high responsiveness to you).

Tentatively I wonder, are verbs with direct objects more restrictive, certainly
for the art of so-called ‘teaching’? Should we look for verbs with indirect objects when
conceptualising our relationship with our students?

A bigger question: Why is the sentence beginning with ME at
all?

Or, to put it another way, if I am ‘teaching you’, then what
are YOU doing? Being taught? Passively? You are being hit, smacked, hugged,
denied, loved, hated, known and buried? You have no choice in the matter.

 “What happened to you today at school?”

 “I was taught.”

 This is the core problem with transitive verb ‘teach’.
(Transitive means it takes a direct object, as discussed above). I teach, you
are taught.

 SHUT UP AND SIT DOWN. I AM GOING TO TEACH YOU.

 Oh yes, I am going to teach you good and proper.

 I am going to teach you A LESSON.

 (A Maths lesson, English lesson, French lesson, or Science lesson).

 Thence a huge leap across a broad chasm, to a distant point
on the far horizon:

 You learn.

 I teach.

 You learn.

 You had better take a long run up to that chasm if you think
that because you are teaching, the direct object of your teaching is learning. Oh
spectacular assumption!

I teach French. I teach students. I teach students French. I
teach French to students.

Sure, and what are the students doing?

They are doing what I damn well tell them to. Maybe I should
issue a command “LEARN!” I shall be like Gandalf with his staff, bending
reality to my will through sheer stubborn conviction.

I am a teach-er. 

Are you just?

What verbs might we deliberately employ instead of the awful
‘teach’? Verbs for me and verbs for those human beings in my classroom I like
to refer to as students?

Verbs with unexpected potentials.

Verbs expecting surprises.

Verbs creating space.

Verbs respecting relationships.

Verbs for my students and verbs for me.

Leave a comment with your ideas. I walk around with a bit of
paper all the time now, so keen I am to liberate my mind from inherited
vocabularies. Feed me, dear reader.

No ‘learning facilitator’ phrases please. I’d rather teach.
Give me something humane, heartfelt, and encompassing. Metaphors allowed and welcomed.

TEACH ME!