We've had our virtual world "Booralie" running for almost a year now and I'm thinking "Where to next?"
I sent my thoughts to a team of teachers at my school, Northern Beaches Christian School.
Here is that email. I finish with some conclusions as to where we might go next.
Booralie Island was the beginning of a journey - just a beginning. 'Virtual worlds' will increase in relevance over the coming years.
Technology is changing the fabric of how we relate. This is simply a fact. The choice we're left with as educators, is to stand to the side and watch new generations figure it out for themselves without us, or what I'm suggesting: notice the changes and guide our students as we see best, believing that they can benefit from, and NEED, our adult wisdom. Whether you're skeptical of the new space, or embrace it, is irrelevant - the point is to know what's happening and engage with students so that they hear your perspective and are guided by your adult wisdom. What we don't want is a conspicuous silence/absence.
Here is a superb overview of the current state of virtual worlds and current initiatives in education: http://www.l4l.co.uk/?p=592 Have a good read of it if you have time, to get up to speed on where things are up to, globally.
Highly significant is the argument that we now have the 'V' generation - young people who have grown up using virtual worlds. A classic example of this is Club Penguin. So 5 year olds are familiar and comfortable interacting in an online virtual space then this becomes a staple tool of connection - an assumed space just like the internet has been an assumed space for some older students because they've never known a world without it.
So 3D spaces are only going to become more 'normal'. This Gartner report addresses commercial implications of this: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=721008 (the full report costs $200!).
Consider the way that people who can't use the internet are disadvantaged. I wonder if it will become more the case that people who can't navigate and interact in virtual worlds are disadvantaged. The internet as 2D 'pages' may be seen as a dinosaur in some years from now.
So, we're on the right journey with Booralie. But, where to next?
Well, I've learnt a thing or two over the last couple of days:
1. There is at least one example, being implemented as we speak, of a virtual space being made available to every student in an entire country. The country is Scotland. Their intranet system is called 'Glow' and seems to function like Moodle for the masses - a central registration system for all the students in all the schools. Think of that! It's happening now!
A guy called Derek Robertson has set up the virtual space, like Booralie but bigger, and linked the user registration system to the country's 'Glow' system, so any student can log in with their normal username and password.
Enter discovery number 2:
2. There is software that runs very similarly to the 'Second Life' system we use for Booralie Island, but it is open source and free. In Craig's words, as we explored this other system on the weekend together, it is the "Moodle of Virtual Worlds". It is called "OpenSim" - keep that in your vocabulary. I've been aware of it vaguely for a while.
However I have recently discovered that there are companies that will set up and run OpenSim for you at the fraction of the price you'd pay to Linden Lab for a Second Life island. You can have much more space for less money. There are no imposed rules (such as users have to be over 13). There shouldn't be any problem tying it to our LDAP user database, i.e. we could make it so that once a student is on Moodle, they can also enter our virtual 3d space.
Thrown into all this is the "SLOODLE" project - that allows Moodle tools to operate in a 3D environment such as Second Life or Open Sim.
What would your Moodle page look like if it was 3D? If it was a house you could walk through? How would that change the way our students view the subject? Their engagement with it? My students are always asking "Mr Collis where on the Year 8 French page is it?" Imagine if I could reply "It's through the new door at the back of the lounge room." How would you logically set out your Moodle page if it were a house, not a page? Or if it were a beach? Or a space station? Or a café? Or a cave? Or a scene from Kill Bill? After all, visually we're wired for 3D space, not 2D space. Moodle begins to look clunky, doesn't it?
Taking all of those developments into account, I have some specific suggestions for where we go next. I need to research them more, but this is what we should probably be doing and where I think we'll probably end up:
1. I <think> we should leave Second Life and get OpenSim set up instead, with a lot more room, and linked to our Moodle user system. The new space would still be called "Booralie".
2. Therefore, envisage a situation where every teacher knows their students can automatically log into our new Booralie. It's assumed. It's normal. They login using their Moodle password. This means younger students in Primary would be able to log in. (We could, and should have a separate space for Primary).
3. We open up a section of Booralie to other schools. ANY other schools. We use the principles of the Beyond Borders website. We charge a fee to the school, thus making it scalable. We aim for the beginning of 2010 with this, and make it a teacher training course that we offer. We need a name for this space. It will become a name recognised in many schools.
4. Within a year from now, some Moodle courses appear in Booralie, especially our online courses where online students can interact with each other in-world. Within 3 to 5 years from now, many/most of our courses exist in Booralie. Also, every Faculty has space on Booralie. We notice that we take Booralie space for granted like we take the physical space of NBCS for granted.
This is all in my head right now. We'll see how it pans out, won't we!?
Interesting that you're talking about moving from Second Life to OpenSim. This appears to be the conclusion of a number of people at the moment...why do you think that is?
Posted by: Sarah Stewart | October 06, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Hi Sarah,
Two simple reasons in our case:
1. Less costly than Linden Lab, and
2. More flexible
Number 2 is highly significant, because it takes a lot of faffing about with Linden Lab to get a private, locked estate which we have control over - especially controlling user registration.
I want a model I can 'sell' to other schools, and getting set up with Linden Lab was quite torturous and long. With OpenSim we can set up a grid and I can set up the processes for other schools to join, myself. This way we can make it easier.
Posted by: Stephen Collis | October 06, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Hi Steve,
What an innovative and exciting idea to integrate your 3D virtual space seamlessly with your 2D setup!
I agree with you regarding the exciting options offered with OpenSim and how this offers a very cost and time effective method of implementing a virtual worlds program in a school.
We are also looking at an OpenSim option but we are not as far along with our ICT journey as NBCS. However, we are constantly looking to your school as a wonderful example of what innovation can truly be!
As always, I'll continue to enjoy following your journey :)
Posted by: Lucy Barrow | October 06, 2009 at 02:54 PM
Hi Steve and Sarah, this is exactly the conversation we are having at secondclassroom. There is a great deal of sense in integrating OpenSim into the work we do in schools, to allow students all the free learning time. It's really hard with SecondLife to do all the setup, and existing groups to join are also complex. Keep in touch with developments at http://secondclassroom.ning.com
Posted by: Judy O'Connell | October 06, 2009 at 07:15 PM
Thanks for the post. I have school teachers in my current graduate level education course - "Intro to Second Life for Educators," (which will eventually change to "Intro to Virtual Worlds for Educators"), who are interested in VWs for elementary school students. Teen SL is 13-17. I have been to Reaction Grid via OpenSim and believe that is also 13 and up. Glad to hear it's possible for younger students.
BTW - The two links in your post open a Microsoft Outlook Web Access login page (on my mac computer). Can you redo those links? I'm especially interested in the first link. Thank you!
Posted by: Robin Ashford | October 07, 2009 at 01:33 AM
Hi Robin - I've fixed the links, thanks for pointing out the problem with them!
Posted by: Stephen Collis | October 07, 2009 at 09:51 AM